+5.4%
NEE vs ABCL
+199.8%
-194.3%
-21.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +5.2% | -5.3% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +12.4% | -10.3% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +12.3% | -0.4% | +12.6% | +12.3% |
| 3M | +3.4% | +80.4% | -77.0% | +2.9% |
| 6M | -5.3% | +138.5% | -143.9% | -5.7% |
| YTD | +10.6% | +265.5% | -254.9% | +9.2% |
| All | +5.4% | +199.8% | -194.3% | +5.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling