-41.9%
NCLH vs PLTD
-77.8%
+35.9%
-49.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +4.6% | -4.8% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -6.5% | +5.9% | -12.4% | -5.2% |
| 30D | -23.3% | -11.6% | -11.7% | -25.0% |
| 3M | -18.6% | -29.9% | +11.3% | -22.8% |
| 6M | -26.2% | -28.5% | +2.3% | -28.9% |
| YTD | -30.2% | -20.4% | -9.8% | -30.2% |
| 1Y | -39.2% | -33.3% | -5.9% | -41.0% |
| All | -41.9% | -77.8% | +35.9% | -57.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling