-44.6%
NCLH vs PLTD
-77.2%
+32.6%
-49.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | +0.4% | -3.9% | -3.4% |
| 7D | -4.6% | -0.9% | -3.7% | -4.7% |
| 30D | -19.9% | +1.3% | -21.3% | -19.5% |
| 3M | -22.0% | -32.9% | +10.9% | -26.9% |
| 6M | -28.3% | -24.9% | -3.4% | -30.1% |
| YTD | -33.5% | -18.2% | -15.2% | -33.0% |
| 1Y | -41.5% | -28.7% | -12.8% | -42.3% |
| All | -44.6% | -77.2% | +32.6% | -58.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling