+1,119.4%
NBIS vs ZETA
+15.3%
+1,104.1%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.7% | -1.8% | +9.5% | +8.3% |
| 7D | +22.2% | -2.4% | +24.7% | +22.9% |
| 30D | +29.7% | +15.6% | +14.2% | +22.4% |
| 3M | +11.9% | +41.5% | -29.6% | -3.5% |
| 6M | +173.0% | +63.4% | +109.6% | +118.4% |
| YTD | +191.4% | +51.3% | +140.1% | +138.4% |
| 1Y | +280.7% | +65.8% | +214.9% | +193.5% |
| All | +1,119.4% | +15.3% | +1,104.1% | +860.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling