+1,101.8%
NBIS vs ZETA
+13.9%
+1,087.8%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.2% | -0.2% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +17.8% | -0.1% | +17.8% | +17.5% |
| 30D | +30.5% | +10.5% | +20.1% | +25.1% |
| 3M | +9.2% | +44.3% | -35.1% | -6.6% |
| 6M | +153.2% | +59.4% | +93.7% | +104.4% |
| YTD | +187.1% | +49.5% | +137.7% | +135.9% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | +62.7% | +88.4% | +94.7% |
| All | +1,101.8% | +13.9% | +1,087.8% | +850.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling