+28.0%
NBIS vs ZETA
+84.8%
-56.7%
-50.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.7% | +2.6% | -9.3% | -7.2% |
| 7D | -22.4% | -5.0% | -17.4% | -21.5% |
| 30D | -39.1% | -3.3% | -35.8% | -38.5% |
| 3M | -37.3% | +31.0% | -68.3% | -40.6% |
| 6M | -19.8% | +72.2% | -91.9% | -28.8% |
| YTD | +69.1% | +56.2% | +12.9% | +51.6% |
| 1Y | +28.0% | +90.3% | -62.3% | +6.9% |
| All | +28.0% | +84.8% | -56.7% | +6.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling