+310.6%
NBIS vs PLTD
-78.0%
+388.6%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.8% | +0.4% | -17.2% | -16.6% |
| 7D | +6.9% | -9.8% | +16.6% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -37.8% | +18.9% | -56.7% | -30.4% |
| 3M | -50.4% | -4.2% | -46.1% | -49.8% |
| 6M | -28.2% | -34.8% | +6.6% | -37.8% |
| YTD | +53.7% | -21.1% | +74.8% | +55.9% |
| 1Y | +36.3% | -19.3% | +55.6% | +43.2% |
| All | +310.6% | -78.0% | +388.6% | +153.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling