+628.1%
NBIS vs PLTD
-76.7%
+704.8%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | +2.3% | -7.3% | -4.0% |
| 7D | +8.3% | +9.9% | -1.6% | +13.0% |
| 30D | +18.1% | +3.8% | +14.2% | +19.7% |
| 3M | +7.8% | -32.3% | +40.1% | -9.5% |
| 6M | +136.6% | -25.9% | +162.4% | +115.2% |
| YTD | +172.5% | -16.4% | +188.9% | +175.1% |
| 1Y | +144.3% | -25.2% | +169.4% | +139.2% |
| All | +628.1% | -76.7% | +704.8% | +346.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling