+1,040.6%
NBIS vs LRCX
+316.2%
+724.4%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LRCX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | -5.6% | +0.6% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +8.3% | +1.8% | +6.5% | +6.7% |
| 30D | +18.1% | -4.3% | +22.4% | +24.4% |
| 3M | +7.8% | -7.3% | +15.1% | +16.7% |
| 6M | +136.6% | +38.6% | +98.0% | +71.1% |
| YTD | +172.5% | +74.4% | +98.1% | +55.6% |
| 1Y | +144.3% | +179.1% | -34.9% | -14.4% |
| All | +1,040.6% | +316.2% | +724.4% | +187.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LRCX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LRCX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LRCX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LRCX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling