+1,022.8%
NBIS vs LRCX
+316.5%
+706.3%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LRCX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +0.1% | -1.6% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -3.1% | +2.3% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -8.6% | -4.8% | -5.6% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -17.7% | +18.7% | +22.2% |
| 6M | +100.5% | +36.4% | +64.1% | +47.0% |
| YTD | +168.3% | +74.5% | +93.7% | +53.1% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | +159.4% | -7.7% | -3.9% |
| All | +1,022.8% | +316.5% | +706.3% | +182.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LRCX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LRCX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LRCX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LRCX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling