+1,101.8%
NBIS vs CLBK
+44.5%
+1,057.3%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.3% | -0.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +17.8% | -1.5% | +19.2% | +18.6% |
| 30D | +30.5% | +6.7% | +23.9% | +27.9% |
| 3M | +9.2% | +21.2% | -12.0% | +1.4% |
| 6M | +153.2% | +42.0% | +111.2% | +115.3% |
| YTD | +187.1% | +63.3% | +123.9% | +125.0% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | +65.4% | +85.7% | +92.9% |
| All | +1,101.8% | +44.5% | +1,057.3% | +877.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling