+1,040.6%
NBIS vs CLBK
+45.2%
+995.3%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | +0.5% | -5.6% | -5.3% |
| 7D | +8.3% | -1.4% | +9.7% | +9.0% |
| 30D | +18.1% | +4.5% | +13.5% | +16.4% |
| 3M | +7.8% | +22.8% | -15.0% | -0.6% |
| 6M | +136.6% | +43.4% | +93.1% | +100.1% |
| YTD | +172.5% | +64.1% | +108.4% | +113.0% |
| 1Y | +144.3% | +67.6% | +76.7% | +85.8% |
| All | +1,040.6% | +45.2% | +995.3% | +824.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling