+1,031.9%
NBIS vs ALHC
+24.4%
+1,007.5%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | 0.0% | +7.5% | +7.5% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -0.6% | +8.8% | +8.2% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -1.0% | +4.4% | +3.3% |
| 3M | -12.8% | -10.2% | -2.7% | -13.2% |
| 6M | +131.5% | -28.3% | +159.8% | +127.3% |
| YTD | +170.5% | -31.4% | +201.9% | +166.1% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | -16.9% | +265.7% | +244.3% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +24.4% | +1,007.5% | +862.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling