+1,101.8%
NBIS vs ALHC
+19.8%
+1,082.0%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -3.2% | +1.7% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +17.8% | -4.1% | +21.9% | +17.6% |
| 30D | +30.5% | -5.4% | +36.0% | +30.1% |
| 3M | +9.2% | -32.1% | +41.3% | +6.9% |
| 6M | +153.2% | -28.5% | +181.6% | +147.8% |
| YTD | +187.1% | -34.0% | +221.2% | +182.1% |
| 1Y | +151.1% | -20.9% | +172.0% | +147.5% |
| All | +1,101.8% | +19.8% | +1,082.0% | +920.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling