-61.5%
MUZ vs NIO
-31.0%
-30.5%
-64.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -12.5% | -1.6% | -10.9% | -12.6% |
| 7D | -17.7% | -13.0% | -4.6% | -19.5% |
| 30D | -29.4% | -18.3% | -11.1% | -31.3% |
| All | -61.5% | -31.0% | -30.5% | -63.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling