+110.4%
MUZ vs NIO
-6.4%
+116.8%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +33.9% | -3.0% | +37.0% | +29.5% |
| 7D | +79.0% | -3.6% | +82.6% | +69.2% |
| 30D | +104.4% | -8.0% | +112.4% | +84.1% |
| All | +110.4% | -6.4% | +116.8% | +93.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling