-48.3%
MUZ vs NIO
-40.1%
-8.2%
-71.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +14.2% | +3.4% | +10.8% | +15.3% |
| 7D | +47.2% | -0.6% | +47.8% | +46.3% |
| 30D | +57.1% | -3.5% | +60.6% | +54.2% |
| 3M | -5.3% | -30.7% | +25.4% | -11.0% |
| All | -48.3% | -40.1% | -8.2% | -52.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling