+1,371.2%
MU vs ZTS
-57.7%
+1,429.0%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | -0.6% | +6.7% | +6.1% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -2.0% | +11.0% | +9.1% |
| 30D | +13.8% | +1.9% | +11.9% | +13.6% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -4.0% | +6.1% | +2.4% |
| 6M | +153.8% | -39.1% | +192.9% | +183.4% |
| YTD | +256.4% | -38.8% | +295.2% | +297.0% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | -49.6% | +769.3% | +865.5% |
| All | +1,371.2% | -57.7% | +1,429.0% | +1,718.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling