+226.4%
MU vs ZTS
-29.4%
+255.8%
-45.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +0.5% | -2.1% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +21.6% | +1.0% | +20.6% | +21.8% |
| 30D | -16.2% | +12.4% | -28.6% | -12.8% |
| 3M | -12.4% | +13.6% | -25.9% | -8.3% |
| 6M | +4.2% | +9.3% | -5.1% | +9.0% |
| YTD | +180.0% | -32.6% | +212.5% | +224.9% |
| 1Y | +226.4% | -30.0% | +256.4% | +273.2% |
| All | +226.4% | -29.4% | +255.8% | +273.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling