+189.8%
MU vs ZTS
-30.1%
+219.9%
-45.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.3% | +3.7% | +2.6% | +7.0% |
| 7D | -12.0% | -1.0% | -11.0% | -11.6% |
| 30D | -28.7% | +10.8% | -39.5% | -26.0% |
| 3M | -16.4% | +14.1% | -30.5% | -12.5% |
| 6M | -1.8% | +0.8% | -2.6% | +3.0% |
| YTD | +157.1% | -33.1% | +190.2% | +197.2% |
| All | +189.8% | -30.1% | +219.9% | +226.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling