+186.6%
MU vs ZTS
-30.0%
+216.6%
-45.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +0.2% | -1.3% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -15.2% | -0.6% | -14.6% | -14.7% |
| 30D | -29.5% | +11.0% | -40.5% | -26.8% |
| 3M | -15.8% | +10.9% | -26.7% | -12.3% |
| 6M | -2.9% | +0.9% | -3.8% | +1.9% |
| YTD | +154.2% | -33.0% | +187.2% | +194.1% |
| 1Y | +186.6% | -29.6% | +216.2% | +223.0% |
| All | +186.6% | -30.0% | +216.6% | +223.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling