+1,371.2%
MU vs NFLX
+77.4%
+1,293.9%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NFLX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | -5.3% | +11.4% | +7.0% |
| 7D | +9.0% | -4.2% | +13.2% | +9.7% |
| 30D | +13.8% | +5.5% | +8.4% | +12.4% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -4.1% | +6.1% | +2.7% |
| 6M | +153.8% | -20.7% | +174.5% | +167.5% |
| YTD | +256.4% | -16.5% | +272.9% | +268.3% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | -37.8% | +757.5% | +846.8% |
| All | +1,371.2% | +77.4% | +1,293.9% | +1,157.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NFLX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NFLX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NFLX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NFLX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling