+836.8%
MU vs NBIS
+1,484.3%
-647.5%
-42.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | +7.5% | -1.4% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +9.0% | +8.2% | +0.7% | +6.6% |
| 30D | +13.8% | +3.4% | +10.4% | +10.6% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -12.8% | +14.9% | +2.4% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +131.5% | +22.3% | +96.3% |
| YTD | +256.4% | +170.5% | +85.9% | +162.3% |
| 1Y | +719.8% | +248.8% | +471.0% | +448.0% |
| All | +836.8% | +1,484.3% | -647.5% | +352.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling