+821.7%
MU vs NBIS
+1,606.6%
-784.9%
-42.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +7.7% | -9.3% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +7.2% | +22.2% | -15.1% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +14.0% | +29.7% | -15.8% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +5.4% | +11.9% | -6.5% | -1.0% |
| 6M | +170.3% | +173.0% | -2.7% | +100.1% |
| YTD | +250.7% | +191.4% | +59.3% | +152.5% |
| 1Y | +662.1% | +280.7% | +381.4% | +396.6% |
| All | +821.7% | +1,606.6% | -784.9% | +335.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling