+258.1%
MTZ vs RGEN
+15.5%
+242.6%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.5% | +3.0% | +6.6% | +8.9% |
| 7D | -6.4% | -1.9% | -4.5% | -6.0% |
| 30D | -22.1% | +3.7% | -25.8% | -23.0% |
| 3M | -32.7% | +8.8% | -41.5% | -34.7% |
| 6M | -59.8% | +38.0% | -97.8% | -63.9% |
| YTD | -19.9% | +5.9% | -25.8% | -22.5% |
| 1Y | -11.5% | +19.7% | -31.1% | -17.6% |
| 3Y | +258.1% | +20.5% | +237.6% | +212.2% |
| All | +258.1% | +15.5% | +242.6% | +212.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling