+39.3%
MTZ vs RGEN
+37.7%
+1.6%
-46.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.8% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +3.6% | -0.9% | +4.4% | +3.7% |
| 30D | -9.6% | +2.8% | -12.5% | -10.0% |
| 3M | -31.9% | +34.5% | -66.4% | -35.2% |
| 6M | -13.8% | +40.5% | -54.3% | -19.6% |
| YTD | +13.3% | +2.8% | +10.4% | +16.9% |
| 1Y | +39.3% | +39.6% | -0.3% | +35.4% |
| All | +39.3% | +37.7% | +1.6% | +35.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling