+29.7%
MSFT vs ZM
-16.8%
+46.6%
-23.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -0.9% | -1.3% | -1.9% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -1.0% | +3.3% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -7.0% | +6.6% | +2.0% |
| 3M | +5.6% | -15.2% | +20.7% | +11.2% |
| All | +29.7% | -16.8% | +46.6% | +32.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling