+51.2%
MSFT vs ZM
+30.9%
+20.3%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -4.8% | +3.7% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -1.4% | +1.6% | -3.0% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -1.0% | -7.7% | +6.7% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +20.2% | -4.7% | +24.8% | +20.7% |
| 6M | +21.3% | +24.4% | -3.2% | +14.6% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +11.8% | -9.0% | -0.8% |
| 1Y | 0.0% | +13.4% | -13.4% | -4.0% |
| 3Y | +51.2% | +33.8% | +17.4% | +40.6% |
| All | +51.2% | +30.9% | +20.3% | +40.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling