+195.7%
MRVL vs NIO
-60.1%
+255.9%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.7% | -4.9% | +0.2% | -3.6% |
| 7D | +11.0% | -14.5% | +25.5% | +14.7% |
| 30D | -36.1% | -15.0% | -21.1% | -33.8% |
| 3M | -29.4% | -35.6% | +6.1% | -22.8% |
| 6M | -11.9% | -55.7% | +43.8% | +3.4% |
| YTD | +84.8% | -43.1% | +127.9% | +105.5% |
| 1Y | +79.4% | -53.5% | +132.9% | +106.3% |
| 3Y | +195.7% | -59.8% | +255.6% | +221.8% |
| All | +195.7% | -60.1% | +255.9% | +221.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling