+89.3%
MRVL vs NIO
-53.4%
+142.7%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.3% | -1.2% | +10.6% | +9.7% |
| 7D | +5.6% | -1.8% | +7.5% | +6.4% |
| 30D | -36.5% | -6.6% | -29.9% | -34.9% |
| 3M | -20.5% | -29.9% | +9.4% | -11.3% |
| 6M | -1.1% | -46.6% | +45.5% | +19.1% |
| YTD | +99.0% | -36.5% | +135.4% | +125.5% |
| 1Y | +89.3% | -51.1% | +140.4% | +118.9% |
| All | +89.3% | -53.4% | +142.7% | +118.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling