+84.4%
MRVL vs NIO
-53.2%
+137.6%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -5.9% | +3.3% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +23.1% | -4.7% | +27.8% | +25.1% |
| 30D | -38.8% | -14.3% | -24.5% | -35.4% |
| 3M | -24.2% | -32.8% | +8.6% | -14.2% |
| 6M | 0.0% | -49.8% | +49.9% | +23.1% |
| YTD | +93.8% | -40.2% | +134.0% | +124.2% |
| 1Y | +84.4% | -52.7% | +137.1% | +113.8% |
| All | +84.4% | -53.2% | +137.6% | +113.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling