+66.1%
MRVL vs NIO
-51.1%
+117.2%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.5% | +0.6% | +8.9% | +9.3% |
| 7D | -9.8% | +6.9% | -16.7% | -11.7% |
| 30D | -43.8% | -4.7% | -39.1% | -42.8% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -28.1% | -1.2% | -21.9% |
| 6M | -9.1% | -41.7% | +32.6% | +6.9% |
| YTD | +82.2% | -33.1% | +115.4% | +103.1% |
| All | +66.1% | -51.1% | +117.2% | +87.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling