+249.5%
MRVL vs NIO
-37.4%
+286.9%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | -1.6% | +8.6% | +7.5% |
| 7D | +3.2% | -13.0% | +16.2% | +7.9% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -18.3% | +24.2% | +12.8% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -33.2% | +3.9% | -19.5% |
| 6M | +186.5% | -21.5% | +208.0% | +206.8% |
| YTD | +163.4% | -25.5% | +188.9% | +185.0% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | -38.0% | +287.5% | +322.4% |
| All | +249.5% | -37.4% | +286.9% | +322.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling