+321.2%
MRVL vs GTLB
-12.2%
+333.3%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.7% | +6.0% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +13.8% | -6.6% | +20.4% | +15.5% |
| 30D | +12.7% | +13.7% | -1.1% | +8.8% |
| 3M | -11.9% | +52.9% | -64.8% | -21.3% |
| 6M | +153.8% | +88.5% | +65.4% | +109.3% |
| YTD | +177.0% | +23.4% | +153.5% | +158.9% |
| 1Y | +252.3% | -3.8% | +256.2% | +252.5% |
| All | +321.2% | -12.2% | +333.3% | +319.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling