+88.2%
MRVL vs GTLB
+2.8%
+85.4%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -0.1% | -2.5% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +23.1% | -3.5% | +26.6% | +23.0% |
| 30D | -38.8% | -9.0% | -29.8% | -38.8% |
| 3M | -24.2% | +15.9% | -40.1% | -21.8% |
| 6M | 0.0% | +104.9% | -104.8% | +8.6% |
| YTD | +93.8% | +26.0% | +67.9% | +103.2% |
| All | +88.2% | +2.8% | +85.4% | +87.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling