+251.6%
MRVL vs GLXY
+12.0%
+239.6%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | -0.6% | +7.7% | +7.2% |
| 7D | +3.2% | +13.4% | -10.2% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +5.9% | +38.1% | -32.2% | -4.1% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -7.3% | -22.0% | -28.7% |
| 6M | +186.5% | +8.2% | +178.3% | +174.7% |
| YTD | +163.4% | +17.8% | +145.7% | +140.4% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | +14.9% | +234.6% | +210.1% |
| All | +251.6% | +12.0% | +239.6% | +208.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling