+122.2%
MRVL vs GLXY
-41.9%
+164.0%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | +5.2% | +0.5% | +3.9% |
| 7D | -28.1% | -14.6% | -13.5% | -24.3% |
| 30D | -50.4% | -36.2% | -14.2% | -42.7% |
| 3M | -32.9% | -30.1% | -2.8% | -25.1% |
| 6M | -17.9% | -56.1% | +38.2% | +2.8% |
| YTD | +66.4% | -38.9% | +105.3% | +85.9% |
| 1Y | +51.5% | -55.0% | +106.6% | +81.0% |
| All | +122.2% | -41.9% | +164.0% | +138.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling