+289.8%
MRVL vs GLDM
+128.8%
+161.0%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | -0.9% | +7.9% | +7.5% |
| 7D | +3.2% | -0.5% | +3.7% | +3.4% |
| 30D | +5.9% | +4.4% | +1.5% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -29.3% | -1.1% | -28.3% | -29.1% |
| 6M | +186.5% | -13.7% | +200.2% | +197.2% |
| YTD | +163.4% | +2.8% | +160.7% | +164.9% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | +24.8% | +224.6% | +239.3% |
| All | +289.8% | +128.8% | +161.0% | +219.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling