+89.3%
MRVL vs GLDM
-3.6%
+92.9%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.3% | -1.2% | +10.5% | +10.2% |
| 7D | +5.6% | -2.0% | +7.6% | +7.0% |
| 30D | -36.5% | -4.4% | -32.1% | -34.1% |
| 3M | -20.5% | -8.8% | -11.6% | -14.2% |
| 6M | -1.1% | -15.9% | +14.7% | +10.9% |
| YTD | +99.0% | -7.7% | +106.7% | +111.0% |
| 1Y | +89.3% | -3.6% | +92.9% | +84.1% |
| All | +89.3% | -3.6% | +92.9% | +84.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling