+82.7%
MRVL vs GLDM
+2.8%
+80.0%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.1% | +3.7% | -10.8% | -10.0% |
| 7D | -36.5% | -0.3% | -36.2% | -36.3% |
| 30D | -41.1% | -1.9% | -39.2% | -40.0% |
| 3M | -26.9% | -0.4% | -26.5% | -25.9% |
| 6M | -2.3% | -10.1% | +7.8% | +5.9% |
| YTD | +88.4% | -5.8% | +94.2% | +93.9% |
| 1Y | +82.7% | +3.1% | +79.6% | +62.6% |
| All | +82.7% | +2.8% | +80.0% | +62.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling