+237.3%
MRVL vs FLNC
-71.1%
+308.4%
-61.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | -4.2% | +0.8% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +8.7% | -5.0% | +13.7% | +9.7% |
| 30D | +6.9% | -26.1% | +33.0% | +14.3% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -55.2% | +45.1% | +8.0% |
| 6M | +143.4% | -42.6% | +186.0% | +166.4% |
| YTD | +167.5% | -51.0% | +218.5% | +191.6% |
| 1Y | +239.0% | +43.3% | +195.6% | +169.7% |
| 3Y | +311.0% | -63.4% | +374.4% | +281.0% |
| All | +237.3% | -71.1% | +308.4% | +139.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling