+323.1%
MRVL vs FLNC
-62.9%
+386.0%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | +2.5% | +1.6% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +5.6% | -4.1% | +9.7% | +6.3% |
| 30D | +8.8% | -24.8% | +33.5% | +14.9% |
| 3M | -15.9% | -59.1% | +43.2% | -0.3% |
| 6M | +161.3% | -42.0% | +203.2% | +185.8% |
| YTD | +178.2% | -49.8% | +228.0% | +202.5% |
| 1Y | +255.3% | +43.1% | +212.2% | +203.3% |
| 3Y | +323.1% | -61.0% | +384.1% | +292.0% |
| All | +323.1% | -62.9% | +386.0% | +292.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling