+298.8%
MRVL vs CFG
+189.1%
+109.7%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.0% | -0.1% | +7.1% | +7.1% |
| 7D | +3.2% | +1.5% | +1.7% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +5.9% | -3.8% | +9.8% | +8.1% |
| 3M | -29.3% | +11.5% | -40.8% | -34.9% |
| 6M | +186.5% | +19.2% | +167.3% | +153.7% |
| YTD | +163.4% | +23.7% | +139.7% | +126.5% |
| 1Y | +249.5% | +38.8% | +210.6% | +177.8% |
| All | +298.8% | +189.1% | +109.7% | +115.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling