+242.3%
MRVL vs CFG
+39.0%
+203.3%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -1.1% | +1.9% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +7.1% | +2.7% | +4.5% | +5.9% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -3.7% | +6.7% | +4.4% |
| 3M | -21.9% | +9.5% | -31.4% | -26.7% |
| 6M | +151.8% | +22.2% | +129.6% | +123.6% |
| YTD | +165.6% | +22.3% | +143.3% | +133.9% |
| 1Y | +242.3% | +39.4% | +202.8% | +190.1% |
| All | +242.3% | +39.0% | +203.3% | +190.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling