-42.7%
MCHP vs GLDM
-13.2%
-29.4%
-42.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -10.0% | -0.8% | -9.2% | -9.4% |
| 7D | -24.6% | +4.7% | -29.2% | -27.7% |
| 30D | -25.2% | -0.9% | -24.3% | -24.5% |
| 3M | -21.1% | -4.3% | -16.8% | -18.5% |
| 6M | -42.7% | -13.4% | -29.3% | -33.4% |
| All | -42.7% | -13.2% | -29.4% | -33.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling