-22.5%
MCHP vs GLDM
-1.5%
-21.0%
-30.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | -0.9% | +2.3% | +2.3% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -0.5% | +2.2% | +2.2% |
| 30D | -4.1% | +4.4% | -8.5% | -9.0% |
| 3M | -22.5% | -1.1% | -21.5% | -22.2% |
| All | -22.5% | -1.5% | -21.0% | -22.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling