+102.8%
LSCC vs EAT
+467.5%
-364.7%
-54.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -4.1% | +1.8% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -5.9% | +10.9% | +6.6% |
| 30D | -11.7% | +0.7% | -12.4% | -12.2% |
| 3M | -13.3% | -14.2% | +0.9% | -10.7% |
| 6M | -12.5% | +40.7% | -53.3% | -22.7% |
| YTD | +51.2% | +36.0% | +15.2% | +33.9% |
| 1Y | +65.9% | +83.1% | -17.2% | +33.3% |
| All | +102.8% | +467.5% | -364.7% | -7.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling