+68.0%
LSCC vs EAT
+98.1%
-30.1%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.1% | -2.9% | +10.0% | +7.6% |
| 7D | +13.0% | -2.6% | +15.6% | +13.4% |
| 30D | -19.8% | +11.5% | -31.3% | -21.2% |
| 3M | -18.4% | -9.1% | -9.3% | -17.5% |
| 6M | -16.1% | +40.4% | -56.5% | -23.6% |
| YTD | +42.7% | +43.9% | -1.2% | +30.4% |
| 1Y | +68.0% | +101.9% | -33.9% | +61.8% |
| All | +68.0% | +98.1% | -30.1% | +61.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling