+69.8%
LSCC vs EAT
+96.9%
-27.0%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.4% | -1.5% | +9.9% | +8.6% |
| 7D | +19.3% | -3.9% | +23.3% | +20.0% |
| 30D | -9.6% | +5.0% | -14.6% | -10.4% |
| 3M | -12.4% | -9.6% | -2.8% | -11.5% |
| 6M | -10.5% | +46.8% | -57.2% | -19.1% |
| YTD | +54.8% | +41.8% | +13.0% | +42.5% |
| All | +69.8% | +96.9% | -27.0% | +65.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling