+446.3%
LRCX vs MLM
+41.9%
+404.4%
-56.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | MLM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +1.1% | +4.0% | +4.3% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -2.9% | +4.8% | +3.9% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -6.8% | +6.9% | +4.7% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -11.2% | +2.7% | -3.0% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -21.8% | +59.9% | +61.7% |
| YTD | +80.1% | -17.0% | +97.0% | +99.7% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | -16.4% | +224.4% | +238.9% |
| 3Y | +350.2% | +14.5% | +335.7% | +277.9% |
| All | +446.3% | +41.9% | +404.4% | +277.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MLM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MLM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MLM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MLM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling