+221.6%
LRCX vs MLM
+18.7%
+202.9%
-57.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MLM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.2% | -1.8% | +10.1% | +9.2% |
| 7D | -16.2% | -4.1% | -12.1% | -14.0% |
| 30D | -39.2% | +8.2% | -47.3% | -41.8% |
| 3M | -34.4% | -3.6% | -30.8% | -33.2% |
| 6M | -32.4% | -15.6% | -16.9% | -26.4% |
| YTD | +17.4% | -16.4% | +33.9% | +27.6% |
| 1Y | +24.2% | -14.3% | +38.5% | +32.7% |
| 3Y | +221.6% | +19.3% | +202.3% | +159.5% |
| All | +221.6% | +18.7% | +202.9% | +159.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MLM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MLM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MLM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MLM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling