-23.4%
LRCX vs FITB
+14.7%
-38.0%
-57.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | +1.1% | -4.5% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +12.7% | +2.8% | +10.0% | +11.6% |
| 30D | -21.3% | +9.8% | -31.1% | -23.4% |
| 3M | -32.9% | -5.2% | -27.7% | -30.9% |
| 6M | -23.4% | +17.3% | -40.7% | -28.8% |
| All | -23.4% | +14.7% | -38.0% | -28.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling