+388.9%
LRCX vs FITB
+128.2%
+260.7%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.6% | -0.8% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -0.4% | +9.9% | +9.7% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -5.1% | +8.2% | +6.0% |
| 3M | -3.4% | +3.5% | -6.9% | -5.4% |
| 6M | +49.7% | +17.2% | +32.5% | +37.1% |
| YTD | +84.9% | +17.6% | +67.2% | +68.6% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | +23.4% | +177.5% | +167.0% |
| All | +388.9% | +128.2% | +260.7% | +254.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling