-32.7%
LRCX vs DECK
-10.2%
-22.5%
-57.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.4% | -1.5% | -14.8% | -16.6% |
| 7D | -27.2% | +6.0% | -33.2% | -26.2% |
| 30D | -44.5% | +7.4% | -52.0% | -43.5% |
| 3M | -39.7% | -11.7% | -28.0% | -41.0% |
| 6M | -32.7% | -11.0% | -21.8% | -36.1% |
| All | -32.7% | -10.2% | -22.5% | -36.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling