+197.1%
LRCX vs DECK
-12.4%
+209.5%
-57.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.4% | -1.5% | -14.8% | -16.0% |
| 7D | -27.2% | +6.0% | -33.2% | -28.4% |
| 30D | -44.5% | +7.4% | -52.0% | -45.7% |
| 3M | -39.7% | -11.7% | -28.0% | -37.9% |
| 6M | -32.7% | -11.0% | -21.8% | -31.8% |
| YTD | +8.5% | -15.4% | +23.9% | +11.2% |
| 1Y | +12.7% | +7.2% | +5.5% | +6.5% |
| All | +197.1% | -12.4% | +209.5% | +192.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling