+351.0%
LRCX vs DECK
-3.0%
+354.0%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +1.6% | +3.6% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -2.2% | +4.1% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -13.6% | +13.7% | +3.7% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -21.2% | +12.8% | -3.4% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -21.1% | +59.2% | +45.4% |
| YTD | +80.1% | -17.2% | +97.3% | +85.8% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | -30.7% | +238.8% | +234.0% |
| All | +351.0% | -3.0% | +354.0% | +373.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling